Genuine Parts vs LKQ
GPC and LKQ side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPC and LKQ compare
Genuine Parts is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as LKQ ($16.7B against $4.7B).
On earnings, LKQ is cheaper: it trades at 18.6× trailing earnings, against 465× for Genuine Parts.
Genuine Parts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.5% versus −0.42% for LKQ).
LKQ keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.9% compared with 0.13% at Genuine Parts.
Both pay dividends: Genuine Parts yields 3.5% and LKQ 6.5%.
LKQ scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Genuine Parts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPC | LKQ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.7B | $4.7B |
| Share price | $120.90 | $18.56 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.4% | −38.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −11.3% | −67.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 65K | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 465× | 18.6× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | 0.7× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.3× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.9× | 7.7× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.6% | 13.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $47.74 | $32.96 |
| Margin of safety | −153% | 43.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% (better) | −0.42% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −95.9% | −63.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.5% | −63.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.9% | 38.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 4.8% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 1.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% | 4.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.71% | 4.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 7.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.80 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 1.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 | 2.32 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% | 6.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 1753% | 120% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 9.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.6% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 0.65% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$668K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 6.5% |
Go deeper
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
- LKQ stock overview
- LKQ income statement
- LKQ valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.