Genuine Parts vs WESCO International
GPC and WCC side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPC and WCC compare
Genuine Parts and WESCO International are about the same size, with market caps of $16.7B and $16.7B.
On earnings, WESCO International is cheaper: it trades at 21.3× trailing earnings, against 465× for Genuine Parts.
WESCO International grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.5% versus 5.5% for Genuine Parts).
WESCO International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with 0.13% at Genuine Parts.
Both pay dividends: Genuine Parts yields 3.5% and WESCO International 0.57%.
WESCO International scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Genuine Parts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPC | WCC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.7B | $16.7B |
| Share price | $120.90 | $343.11 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.4% | 50.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −11.3% | 151% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 1.63 |
| Employees | 65K | 21K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 465× | 21.3× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | 3.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.3× | 13.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.9× (better) | 40.2× |
| FCF yield | 4.6% (better) | 2.5% |
| Fair value | $47.74 | $274.08 |
| Margin of safety | −153% | −25.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 13.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 13.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −95.9% | 22.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.5% | 26.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 53.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.9% (better) | 21.5% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.6% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 3.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Return on equity | 0.71% | 15.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.80 | 3.12 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 2.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 | 3.22 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% (better) | 0.57% |
| Payout ratio | 1753% | 12.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.45% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% (better) | 1.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.6% | 96.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.65% | 2.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$668K (better) | −$67.6M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
- WCC stock overview
- WCC income statement
- WCC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.