Genuine Parts vs Reliance
GPC and RS side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPC and RS compare
Reliance is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Genuine Parts ($22.3B against $16.7B).
On earnings, Reliance is cheaper: it trades at 25.4× trailing earnings, against 465× for Genuine Parts.
Reliance grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.4% versus 5.5% for Genuine Parts).
Reliance keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.7% compared with 0.13% at Genuine Parts.
Both pay dividends: Genuine Parts yields 3.5% and Reliance 1.1%.
Reliance scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for Genuine Parts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPC | RS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $16.7B | $22.3B |
| Share price | $120.90 | $436.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.4% | 54.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −11.3% | 168% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 65K | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 465× | 25.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.7× (better) | 1.4× |
| P/B | 3.7× | 3.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.3× | 15.7× (better) |
| P/FCF | 21.9× (better) | 41.3× |
| FCF yield | 4.6% (better) | 2.4% |
| Fair value | $47.74 | $275.24 |
| Margin of safety | −153% | −58.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% | 15.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 10.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −95.9% | 21.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.5% | 25.5% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.9% (better) | 28.2% |
| Operating margin | – | 7.8% |
| Net margin | 0.13% | 5.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.0% | 3.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 0.71% | 12.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.80 | 0.94 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 19.5× |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 4.30 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.19 | 6.69 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.5% (better) | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | 1753% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 15 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 13.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.6% | 82.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.65% | 0.43% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$668K (better) | −$16.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
- RS stock overview
- RS income statement
- RS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.