Genuine Parts vs Goodyear Tire & Rubber
GPC and GT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPC and GT compare
Genuine Parts is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Goodyear Tire & Rubber ($17.0B against $1.2B).
Genuine Parts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus −3.9% for Goodyear Tire & Rubber).
Genuine Parts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.12% compared with −3.3% at Goodyear Tire & Rubber.
Genuine Parts pays a dividend yielding 3.4%; Goodyear Tire & Rubber does not pay one.
Genuine Parts scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Goodyear Tire & Rubber), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPC | GT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $17.0B | $1.2B |
| Share price | $123.34 | $4.12 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.0% | −46.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.8% | −81.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 65K | 63K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 474× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.7× | 0.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.9× | 8.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 22.3× | 13.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 7.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $47.54 | $13.02 |
| Margin of safety | −159% | 68.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.3% (better) | −3.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.0% | 8.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −96.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −95.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.1% (better) | 17.8% |
| Net margin | 0.12% (better) | −3.3% |
| FCF margin | 3.0% (better) | 0.51% |
| Return on equity | 0.66% (better) | −20.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.10 (better) | 2.80 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 7.71 | 6.62 (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.22 (better) | 1.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.21 (better) | 1.25 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Payout ratio | 1861% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.6% | 93.9% |
| Held by insiders | 0.65% | 0.74% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$668K | $0 (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 19.7% |
Go deeper
- GPC stock overview
- GPC income statement
- GPC valuation and score
- GT stock overview
- GT income statement
- GT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.