Globalfoundries vs Skyworks Solutions
GFS and SWKS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GFS and SWKS compare
Globalfoundries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.4% versus −3.1% for Skyworks Solutions).
Globalfoundries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.3% compared with 4.3% at Skyworks Solutions.
Skyworks Solutions pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Globalfoundries does not pay one.
Skyworks Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Globalfoundries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GFS | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $13.5B |
| Share price | $41.47 | $89.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.4% | 29.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.2% | −44.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.80 | 1.32 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 78.9× |
| P/S | – | 3.4× |
| P/B | – | 2.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 50.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 59.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 1.7% |
| Fair value | – | $46.61 |
| Margin of safety | – | −93.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% (better) | −3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% (better) | −5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −63.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −63.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −33.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.1% | 40.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.6% (better) | 5.5% |
| Net margin | 10.3% (better) | 4.3% |
| FCF margin | 11.5% (better) | 5.8% |
| Return on equity | 6.2% (better) | 3.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% (better) | 4.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.04 (better) | −12.03 |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.2× |
| Current ratio | 2.48 | 5.01 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.97 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 186% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.67% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.60% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 3.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.2% | 122% |
| Held by insiders | 72.0% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.4M | $0 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 16.0% |
Go deeper
- GFS stock overview
- GFS income statement
- GFS valuation and score
- SWKS stock overview
- SWKS income statement
- SWKS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.