StockData

Globalfoundries vs Qnity Electronics

GFS and Q side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GFS and Q compare

Qnity Electronics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.8% versus 1.4% for Globalfoundries).

Qnity Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.26%; Globalfoundries does not pay one.

Globalfoundries scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Qnity Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGFSQ
Size and price
Market cap–$24.4B
Share price$41.90$116.67
Change, 1 year22.0%24.1%
Change, 5 years−34.2%–
Beta (5Y)1.791.69
Employees1,60010K
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)7
Valuation score02 (better)
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score01 (better)
Valuation
P/S–4.7×
P/B–3.4×
EV/EBITDA–22.0×
P/FCF–29.6×
FCF yield–3.4%
Fair value–$124.66
Margin of safety–6.4%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.4%14.8% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.0%–
Profitability
Gross margin27.1%46.2% (better)
Operating margin11.6%–
Net margin10.3%–
FCF margin11.5%15.8% (better)
Return on equity6.2%–
Return on invested capital5.8%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.09 (better)0.55
Net debt / EBITDA0.04 (better)2.42
Current ratio2.48 (better)2.01
Altman Z-score–2.67
Piotroski F-score8–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–0.26%
Years of dividend growth–0
Shareholder yield–0.26%
Ownership
Held by institutions98.2%77.5%
Held by insiders72.0%0.14%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$3.8M−$503K (better)
Superinvestors holding–3
Short interest, % of float4.5%2.2%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.