Freedom vs Stifel Financial
FRHC and SF side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FRHC and SF compare
Stifel Financial is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Freedom ($25.1B against $11.9B).
On earnings, Stifel Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.9× trailing earnings, against 73.9× for Freedom.
Freedom grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus 11.0% for Stifel Financial).
Stifel Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.3% compared with 6.5% at Freedom.
Stifel Financial pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; Freedom does not pay one.
Stifel Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for Freedom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FRHC | SF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.9B | $25.1B |
| Share price | $187.00 | $66.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 19.5% | −14.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 167% | 33.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 12K | 9,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 73.9× | 11.9× (better) |
| P/S | 5.0× | 3.7× (better) |
| P/B | 7.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 41.3× | 11.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 69.5× |
| PEG | – | 3.58 |
| FCF yield | −7.5% | 1.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $55.75 | $71.15 |
| Margin of safety | −235% | 6.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.3% (better) | 11.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 44.6% (better) | 10.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 95.1% (better) | 56.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 94.6% (better) | 62.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.39% | 7.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 95.8% | – |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 14.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −37.2% | 5.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.87 (better) | 0.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 32.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 3.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.5% | 36.8% |
| Held by insiders | 68.1% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.8M | −$423K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.1% | – |
Go deeper
- FRHC stock overview
- FRHC income statement
- FRHC valuation and score
- SF stock overview
- SF income statement
- SF valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.