First Industrial Realty Trust vs LXP Industrial Trust
FR and LXP side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FR and LXP compare
First Industrial Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as LXP Industrial Trust ($7.2B against $3.6B).
On earnings, First Industrial Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 19.9× trailing earnings, against 61.2× for LXP Industrial Trust.
First Industrial Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus −4.2% for LXP Industrial Trust).
First Industrial Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 48.0% compared with 18.7% at LXP Industrial Trust.
Both pay dividends: First Industrial Realty Trust yields 3.6% and LXP Industrial Trust 3.4%.
First Industrial Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 4 for LXP Industrial Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FR | LXP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $3.6B |
| Share price | $54.41 | $61.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.3% | 28.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.9% | −17.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.76 |
| Employees | 152 | 58 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× (better) | 61.2× |
| P/S | 9.5× (better) | 10.4× |
| P/B | 2.6× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.0× | 10.9× (better) |
| Fair value | $55.36 | $40.25 |
| Margin of safety | 1.7% (better) | −52.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% (better) | −4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.2% (better) | 1.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.4% (better) | −25.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.7% (better) | −29.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.1% (better) | −11.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 81.5% |
| Net margin | 48.0% (better) | 18.7% |
| Return on equity | 13.4% (better) | 3.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.70 (better) | 1.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| Payout ratio | 68.4% | 258% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.2% (better) | 5.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% (better) | 3.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 3.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.7K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 2.0% |
Go deeper
- FR stock overview
- FR income statement
- FR valuation and score
- LXP stock overview
- LXP income statement
- LXP valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.