First Industrial Realty Trust vs Texas Pacific Land
FR and TPL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FR and TPL compare
Texas Pacific Land is the larger company, worth 3.2 times as much as First Industrial Realty Trust ($22.9B against $7.2B).
On earnings, First Industrial Realty Trust is cheaper: it trades at 19.9× trailing earnings, against 42.3× for Texas Pacific Land.
Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 8.4% for First Industrial Realty Trust).
Texas Pacific Land keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 60.3% compared with 48.0% at First Industrial Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: First Industrial Realty Trust yields 3.6% and Texas Pacific Land 0.70%.
First Industrial Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 16 for Texas Pacific Land), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FR | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $22.9B |
| Share price | $54.41 | $331.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.3% | 7.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.9% | 118% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.63 |
| Employees | 152 | 114 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 16 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× (better) | 42.3× |
| P/S | 9.5× (better) | 25.5× |
| P/B | 2.6× (better) | 13.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.0× (better) | 30.6× |
| PEG | – | 15.22 |
| Fair value | $55.36 | $219.17 |
| Margin of safety | 1.7% (better) | −51.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.2% | 21.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.4% (better) | 17.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.7% (better) | 17.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | 22.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 74.9% |
| Net margin | 48.0% | 60.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 13.4% | 36.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 49.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | – | 4.55 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.70 | 76.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% (better) | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | 68.4% | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.2% | 13.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.04% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% (better) | 0.74% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 30.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.7K (better) | −$2.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- FR stock overview
- FR income statement
- FR valuation and score
- TPL stock overview
- TPL income statement
- TPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.