First Industrial Realty Trust vs Rexford Industrial Realty
FR and REXR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FR and REXR compare
Rexford Industrial Realty is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as First Industrial Realty Trust ($8.5B against $7.2B).
First Industrial Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.4% versus 0.55% for Rexford Industrial Realty).
First Industrial Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 48.0% compared with −39.2% at Rexford Industrial Realty.
Both pay dividends: First Industrial Realty Trust yields 3.6% and Rexford Industrial Realty 4.5%.
First Industrial Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Rexford Industrial Realty), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FR | REXR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.2B | $8.5B |
| Share price | $54.41 | $38.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.3% | −7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −8.9% | −43.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.84 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 152 | 256 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.9× | – |
| P/S | 9.5× | 8.6× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.0× | – |
| Fair value | $55.36 | $32.79 |
| Margin of safety | 1.7% (better) | −16.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.4% (better) | 0.55% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.2% | 24.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 34.4% (better) | −222% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 33.7% (better) | −234% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | 11.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 48.0% (better) | −39.2% |
| Return on equity | 13.4% (better) | −4.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 1.70 (better) | 1.45 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.6% | 4.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 68.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 12.2% | 14.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.6% | 11.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 0.37% | 0.44% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$39.7K (better) | −$3.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 5.4% |
Go deeper
- FR stock overview
- FR income statement
- FR valuation and score
- REXR stock overview
- REXR income statement
- REXR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.