FNB vs WSFS Financial
FNB and WSFS side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FNB and WSFS compare
FNB is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as WSFS Financial ($6.4B against $4.1B).
On earnings, FNB is cheaper: it trades at 10.8× trailing earnings, against 12.6× for WSFS Financial.
FNB grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus 5.8% for WSFS Financial).
FNB keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.0% compared with 29.8% at WSFS Financial.
Both pay dividends: FNB yields 2.8% and WSFS Financial 0.96%.
FNB scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 14 for WSFS Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FNB | WSFS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.4B | $4.1B |
| Share price | $18.18 | $80.06 |
| Change, 1 year | 12.2% | 46.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 47.8% | 48.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.80 |
| Employees | 4,282 | 2,335 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 21 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.8× (better) | 12.6× |
| P/S | 3.5× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/FCF | 10.3× (better) | 14.3× |
| PEG | 1.27 | 0.94 (better) |
| FCF yield | 9.7% (better) | 7.0% |
| Fair value | $19.91 | $69.31 |
| Margin of safety | 8.7% (better) | −15.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | 5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 8.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.3% (better) | 19.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 31.3% (better) | 31.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.9% | 17.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 33.0% (better) | 29.8% |
| FCF margin | 34.0% (better) | 25.6% |
| Return on equity | 9.0% | 12.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.39 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.19 | 0.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% (better) | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | 29.3% | 11.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.00% | 6.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.7% | 8.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 4.5% | 8.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.2% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.4M (better) | −$5.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 5.2% |
Go deeper
- FNB stock overview
- FNB income statement
- FNB valuation and score
- WSFS stock overview
- WSFS income statement
- WSFS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.