Figma vs Gitlab
FIG and GTLB side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIG and GTLB compare
Figma is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Gitlab ($11.5B against $9.0B).
Figma grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (43.4% versus 23.0% for Gitlab).
Gitlab keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −5.0% compared with −123% at Figma.
Gitlab scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Figma), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIG | GTLB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.5B | $9.0B |
| Share price | $21.65 | $54.09 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.4% | 12.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 170% | −56.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.80 | 2.01 |
| Employees | – | 2,580 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 9.0× | 8.5× (better) |
| P/B | 7.8× (better) | 9.7× |
| P/FCF | 49.7× | 42.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.0% | 2.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $6.82 | $42.81 |
| Margin of safety | −218% | −26.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 43.4% (better) | 23.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 44.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1116% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −947% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 79.1% | 85.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | −124% | −8.5% (better) |
| Net margin | −123% | −5.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 18.1% | 20.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −109% | −5.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −10.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.45 (better) | 2.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.83 | 7.90 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 69.0% | 87.7% |
| Held by insiders | 45.7% | 16.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$256M | −$166M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.1% | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- FIG stock overview
- FIG income statement
- FIG valuation and score
- GTLB stock overview
- GTLB income statement
- GTLB valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.