Evergy vs NiSource
EVRG and NI side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EVRG and NI compare
Evergy and NiSource are about the same size, with market caps of $20.5B and $22.1B.
On earnings, Evergy is cheaper: it trades at 22.5× trailing earnings, against 23.5× for NiSource.
NiSource grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.3% versus 3.6% for Evergy).
Evergy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.2% compared with 8.2% at NiSource.
Both pay dividends: Evergy yields 3.1% and NiSource 2.0%.
Evergy scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for NiSource), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EVRG | NI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $20.5B | $22.1B |
| Share price | $88.78 | $46.05 |
| Change, 1 year | 14.8% | 5.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 35.3% | 82.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 4,691 | 7,738 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× (better) | 23.5× |
| P/S | 3.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.0× (better) | 2.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3× (better) | 13.3× |
| PEG | 5.89 | 5.02 (better) |
| FCF yield | −6.9% (better) | −7.1% |
| Fair value | $76.56 | $41.12 |
| Margin of safety | −16.0% | −12.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.6% | 15.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.9% | 7.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 10.2% (better) | 4.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 8.2% (better) | 3.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 86.4% |
| Operating margin | 26.2% (better) | 16.6% |
| Net margin | 15.2% (better) | 8.2% |
| FCF margin | −23.1% | −13.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.2% | 10.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% (better) | 5.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.35 (better) | 1.91 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 4.94 (better) | 5.68 |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× (better) | 2.4× |
| Current ratio | 0.36 | 0.50 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.81 | 0.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.1% (better) | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | 67.4% | 60.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 5.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% (better) | −0.29% |
| Shareholder yield | 3.1% (better) | 1.7% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.5% | 96.4% |
| Held by insiders | 1.3% | 0.37% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.8M (better) | −$6.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.7% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- EVRG stock overview
- EVRG income statement
- EVRG valuation and score
- NI stock overview
- NI income statement
- NI valuation and score
Other comparisons
- AEE vs EVRG
- AEE vs NI
- AES vs NI
- CMS vs NI
- CMS.PB vs NI
- DUK vs NI
- ED vs NI
- EVRG vs LNT
- EVRG vs WEC
- EXC vs NI
- NI vs PCG
- NI vs PEG
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.