Elastic vs Snowflake
ESTC and SNOW side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ESTC and SNOW compare
Snowflake is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Elastic ($103B against $9.3B).
Snowflake grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.0% versus 16.2% for Elastic).
Elastic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.8% compared with −20.1% at Snowflake.
Elastic scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Snowflake), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ESTC | SNOW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.3B | $103B |
| Share price | $88.15 | $291.00 |
| Change, 1 year | −4.7% | 7.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.7% | −25.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.79 | 1.65 |
| Employees | 4,019 | 2,424 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.5× | – |
| P/S | 5.1× (better) | 18.9× |
| P/B | 7.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 26.5× (better) | 85.9× |
| FCF yield | 3.8% (better) | 1.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.2% | 32.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.4% | 51.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.5% (better) | 67.0% |
| Operating margin | −2.6% (better) | −22.8% |
| Net margin | 20.8% (better) | −20.1% |
| FCF margin | 19.4% | 22.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 33.1% (better) | −46.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −1.9× (better) | −148.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.81 (better) | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.79 | 7.89 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.1% (better) | 0.67% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.1% (better) | 0.67% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.6% | 78.3% |
| Held by insiders | 18.7% | 3.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$435M (better) | −$1.3B |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- ESTC stock overview
- ESTC income statement
- ESTC valuation and score
- SNOW stock overview
- SNOW income statement
- SNOW valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWV vs SNOW
- DDOG vs SNOW
- DT vs ESTC
- ESTC vs MDB
- ESTC vs S
- MDB vs SNOW
- NOW vs SNOW
- SNOW vs TWLO
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.