EQT vs Pembina Pipeline
EQT and PBA side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How EQT and PBA compare
EQT grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (32.3% versus 5.3% for Pembina Pipeline).
EQT keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.4% compared with 21.8% at Pembina Pipeline.
EQT pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Pembina Pipeline does not pay one.
EQT scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 3 for Pembina Pipeline), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | EQT | PBA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $34.1B | – |
| Share price | $54.54 | $51.36 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.5% | 36.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 165% | 51.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.72 | 0.37 |
| Employees | 1,523 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.7× | – |
| P/S | 3.6× | – |
| P/B | 1.4× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 9.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.0% | – |
| Fair value | $60.67 | – |
| Margin of safety | 10.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 32.3% (better) | 5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 23.1% (better) | 5.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 137% (better) | −9.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 134% (better) | −11.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 83.7% (better) | 41.1% |
| Operating margin | 42.5% (better) | 36.1% |
| Net margin | 28.4% (better) | 21.8% |
| FCF margin | 39.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 10.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.82 (better) | 3.05 |
| Interest coverage | 10.4× (better) | 4.7× |
| Current ratio | 0.67 (better) | 0.61 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.37 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 15.0% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 84.3% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.3% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.69% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$24.2M | – |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.6% | – |
Go deeper
- EQT stock overview
- EQT income statement
- EQT valuation and score
- PBA stock overview
- PBA income statement
- PBA valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.