Entegris vs Newell Brands
ENTG and NWL side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENTG and NWL compare
Entegris is the larger company, worth 11 times as much as Newell Brands ($23.6B against $2.2B).
Entegris grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.4% versus 0.79% for Newell Brands).
Entegris keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with −4.4% at Newell Brands.
Both pay dividends: Entegris yields 0.26% and Newell Brands 5.4%.
Entegris scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 9 for Newell Brands), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENTG | NWL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.6B | $2.2B |
| Share price | $154.39 | $5.18 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.3% | 5.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.2% | −78.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 7,700 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 60.3× | – |
| P/S | 6.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | – | 0.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.2× | 17.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 38.3× (better) | 41.6× |
| PEG | 29.95 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% (better) | 2.4% |
| Fair value | $109.53 | $5.84 |
| Margin of safety | −41.0% | 11.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% (better) | 0.79% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | −5.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.2% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.1% (better) | 35.6% |
| Operating margin | 18.2% (better) | 0.98% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | −4.4% |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 0.72% |
| Return on equity | – | −12.8% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 0.81% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.05 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.64 (better) | 11.58 |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.66 (better) | 1.27 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.50 (better) | 0.51 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 5.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | −21.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 5.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.58% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.1M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 10.1% |
Go deeper
- ENTG stock overview
- ENTG income statement
- ENTG valuation and score
- NWL stock overview
- NWL income statement
- NWL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.