Entegris vs Advanced Drainage Systems
ENTG and WMS side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENTG and WMS compare
Entegris is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Advanced Drainage Systems ($23.6B against $10.2B).
On earnings, Advanced Drainage Systems is cheaper: it trades at 23.4× trailing earnings, against 60.3× for Entegris.
Advanced Drainage Systems grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.4% versus 9.4% for Entegris).
Advanced Drainage Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.0% compared with 11.1% at Entegris.
Both pay dividends: Entegris yields 0.26% and Advanced Drainage Systems 0.56%.
Advanced Drainage Systems scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 14 for Entegris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENTG | WMS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.6B | $10.2B |
| Share price | $154.39 | $135.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.3% | −3.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.2% | 9.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.00 | 1.43 |
| Employees | 7,700 | 4,950 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 60.3× | 23.4× (better) |
| P/S | 6.7× | 3.2× (better) |
| P/B | – | 5.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.2× | 13.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 38.3× | 18.6× (better) |
| PEG | 29.95 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 5.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $109.53 | $132.53 |
| Margin of safety | −41.0% | −2.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 10.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 9.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.2% (better) | 4.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.4% (better) | 4.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | 16.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.1% (better) | 38.6% |
| Operating margin | 18.2% | 20.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 14.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 17.1% |
| Return on equity | – | 26.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 18.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.90 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.64 | 1.62 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.66 (better) | 2.12 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.50 (better) | 4.34 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 0.56% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.6% | 12.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.6% | 14.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 3.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 92.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.58% | 1.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.1M | −$14.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- ENTG stock overview
- ENTG income statement
- ENTG valuation and score
- WMS stock overview
- WMS income statement
- WMS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.