AptarGroup vs Entegris
ATR and ENTG side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATR and ENTG compare
Entegris is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as AptarGroup ($23.6B against $8.7B).
On earnings, AptarGroup is cheaper: it trades at 33.3× trailing earnings, against 60.3× for Entegris.
Entegris grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.4% versus 9.0% for AptarGroup).
Entegris keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 6.7% at AptarGroup.
Both pay dividends: AptarGroup yields 1.0% and Entegris 0.26%.
AptarGroup scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Entegris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATR | ENTG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.7B | $23.6B |
| Share price | $137.20 | $154.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.4% | 63.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.3% | 6.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 2.00 |
| Employees | 14K | 7,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.3× (better) | 60.3× |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 6.7× |
| P/B | 3.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.7× (better) | 33.2× |
| P/FCF | 29.6× (better) | 38.3× |
| PEG | 1.86 (better) | 29.95 |
| FCF yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.6% |
| Fair value | $128.41 | $109.53 |
| Margin of safety | −6.8% (better) | −41.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% | 9.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 11.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −36.3% | 36.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.0% | 35.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.9% (better) | −6.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% | 47.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.9% | 18.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.7% | 11.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.4% | 17.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.49 (better) | 3.64 |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× (better) | 3.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.50 | 2.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.10 | 4.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.26% |
| Payout ratio | 46.2% | 15.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.9% (better) | 4.6% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.1% (better) | 0.26% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.3% | 108% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.58% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.8M (better) | −$51.1M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 5.8% |
Go deeper
- ATR stock overview
- ATR income statement
- ATR valuation and score
- ENTG stock overview
- ENTG income statement
- ENTG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.