Entegris vs Karat Packaging
ENTG and KRT side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ENTG and KRT compare
Entegris is the larger company, worth 22 times as much as Karat Packaging ($23.6B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Karat Packaging is cheaper: it trades at 21.6× trailing earnings, against 60.3× for Entegris.
Karat Packaging grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.6% versus 9.4% for Entegris).
Entegris keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.1% compared with 10.2% at Karat Packaging.
Both pay dividends: Entegris yields 0.26% and Karat Packaging 3.4%.
Karat Packaging scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 14 for Entegris), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ENTG | KRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.6B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $154.39 | $53.97 |
| Change, 1 year | 63.3% | 120% |
| Change, 5 years | 6.2% | 135% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.00 | 0.72 |
| Employees | 7,700 | 696 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 60.3× | 21.6× (better) |
| P/S | 6.7× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/B | – | 6.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 33.2× | 14.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 38.3× | 19.4× (better) |
| PEG | 29.95 | 2.29 (better) |
| FCF yield | 2.6% | 5.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $109.53 | $47.49 |
| Margin of safety | −41.0% | −13.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 11.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.4% (better) | 9.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 36.2% | 56.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.4% | 57.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.4% | 6.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.1% (better) | 40.7% |
| Operating margin | 18.2% (better) | 12.8% |
| Net margin | 11.1% (better) | 10.2% |
| FCF margin | 17.5% (better) | 11.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 31.2% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 42.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.07 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.64 (better) | −0.57 |
| Interest coverage | 3.4× | 33.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.66 (better) | 2.25 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.50 | 7.52 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.26% | 3.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 15.6% | 71.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.6% | 114% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.26% | 3.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 108% | 35.7% |
| Held by insiders | 0.58% | 57.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$51.1M | −$569K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.8% | 7.0% |
Go deeper
- ENTG stock overview
- ENTG income statement
- ENTG valuation and score
- KRT stock overview
- KRT income statement
- KRT valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.