DT Midstream vs USA Compression Partners, LP
DTM and USAC side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DTM and USAC compare
DT Midstream is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as USA Compression Partners, LP ($12.7B against $3.6B).
USA Compression Partners, LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.9% versus 13.4% for DT Midstream).
DT Midstream keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 35.4% compared with 12.4% at USA Compression Partners, LP.
Both pay dividends: DT Midstream yields 2.8% and USA Compression Partners, LP 6.3%.
DT Midstream scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for USA Compression Partners, LP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DTM | USAC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $12.7B | $3.6B |
| Share price | $124.34 | $25.17 |
| Change, 1 year | 16.8% | 13.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 155% | 56.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 588 | 885 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 27.0× | – |
| P/S | 9.5× | 3.1× (better) |
| P/B | 2.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.0× | 9.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | 23.8× | 11.8× (better) |
| PEG | 6.57 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.2% | 8.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $88.29 | $31.00 |
| Margin of safety | −40.8% | 18.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.4% | 19.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.5% (better) | 8.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.9% | 55.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 16.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 5.9% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 65.7% |
| Operating margin | 49.4% (better) | 30.0% |
| Net margin | 35.4% (better) | 12.4% |
| FCF margin | 40.0% (better) | 26.3% |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.68 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.26 (better) | 4.36 |
| Interest coverage | 4.0× (better) | 1.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.16 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.89 (better) | 1.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 6.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 73.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 4 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 6.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 87.6% | 37.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.57% | 21.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$6.2K (better) | −$536K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.4% | 1.4% |
Go deeper
- DTM stock overview
- DTM income statement
- DTM valuation and score
- USAC stock overview
- USAC income statement
- USAC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.