BRP vs Oshkosh
DOO and OSK side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DOO and OSK compare
BRP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.8% versus 4.2% for Oshkosh).
Oshkosh pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; BRP does not pay one.
Oshkosh scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for BRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DOO | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $8.6B |
| Share price | $65.49 | $141.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.8% | 15.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −25.2% | 25.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.06 | 1.05 |
| Employees | – | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 11.3% |
| Fair value | – | $113.27 |
| Margin of safety | – | −24.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.2% (better) | 4.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.74% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 22.4% (better) | 15.4% |
| Operating margin | 4.7% | 6.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 10.8% (better) | 9.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.24 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.05 | 0.56 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.27 | 1.72 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.16 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 21.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 5.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 41.5% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 41.0% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- DOO stock overview
- DOO income statement
- DOO valuation and score
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.