CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne
CRWD and S side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRWD and S compare
CrowdStrike is the larger company, worth 29 times as much as SentinelOne ($256B against $8.8B).
CrowdStrike grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.3% versus 21.1% for SentinelOne).
CrowdStrike keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.1% compared with −31.0% at SentinelOne.
CrowdStrike scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for SentinelOne), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRWD | S |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $256B | $8.8B |
| Share price | $250.43 | $25.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.6% | 49.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 266% | −62.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 1.62 |
| Employees | 11K | 2,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 4007× | – |
| P/S | 47.5× | 8.0× (better) |
| P/B | 50.3× | 6.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 159× | 155× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.63% | 0.65% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $17.14 |
| Margin of safety | – | −46.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% (better) | 21.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 40.6% | 60.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.2% (better) | 72.5% |
| Operating margin | −2.2% (better) | −29.5% |
| Net margin | 1.1% (better) | −31.0% |
| FCF margin | 29.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on equity | 1.3% (better) | −23.0% |
| Return on invested capital | −65.8% | −34.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.15 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −4.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.57 (better) | 1.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 22.87 (better) | 4.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.4% | 82.6% |
| Held by insiders | 3.3% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$641M | −$26.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 6.0% |
Go deeper
- CRWD stock overview
- CRWD income statement
- CRWD valuation and score
- S stock overview
- S income statement
- S valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs GEN
- CRWD vs NET
- CRWD vs OKTA
- CRWD vs OTEX
- CRWD vs PLTR
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWD vs SSNC
- CRWD vs ZS
- ESTC vs S
- NTSK vs S
- RBRK vs S
- S vs SAIL
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.