CrowdStrike vs Okta
CRWD and OKTA side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRWD and OKTA compare
CrowdStrike is the larger company, worth 7.0 times as much as Okta ($256B against $36.4B).
On earnings, Okta is cheaper: it trades at 125× trailing earnings, against 4007× for CrowdStrike.
CrowdStrike grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.3% versus 11.2% for Okta).
Okta keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.6% compared with 1.1% at CrowdStrike.
Okta scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for CrowdStrike), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRWD | OKTA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $256B | $36.4B |
| Share price | $250.43 | $208.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 83.6% | 138% |
| Change, 5 years | 266% | −18.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.69 | 1.60 |
| Employees | 11K | 6,366 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 | 4 |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 4007× | 125× (better) |
| P/S | 47.5× | 11.8× (better) |
| P/B | 50.3× | 5.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 147× |
| P/FCF | 159× | 37.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 0.63% | 2.7% (better) |
| Fair value | – | $46.41 |
| Margin of safety | – | −349% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% (better) | 11.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 40.6% (better) | 28.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 76.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 97.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.2% | 78.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | −2.2% | 7.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.1% | 9.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 29.8% | 31.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.3% | 4.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −65.8% | 4.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.15 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −4.5× | 77.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.57 (better) | 1.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 22.87 (better) | 10.28 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.4% | 90.8% |
| Held by insiders | 3.3% | 4.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$641M | −$54.7M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- CRWD stock overview
- CRWD income statement
- CRWD valuation and score
- OKTA stock overview
- OKTA income statement
- OKTA valuation and score
Other comparisons
- CRWD vs GEN
- CRWD vs NET
- CRWD vs OTEX
- CRWD vs PLTR
- CRWD vs S
- CRWD vs SNOW
- CRWD vs SSNC
- CRWD vs ZS
- DOCU vs OKTA
- NET vs OKTA
- OKTA vs TYL
- OKTA vs ZS
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.