Cirrus Logic vs Skyworks Solutions
CRUS and SWKS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRUS and SWKS compare
Skyworks Solutions is the larger company, worth 2.4 times as much as Cirrus Logic ($13.2B against $5.5B).
On earnings, Cirrus Logic is cheaper: it trades at 13.4× trailing earnings, against 45.4× for Skyworks Solutions.
Cirrus Logic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.2% versus 0.06% for Skyworks Solutions).
Cirrus Logic keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 21.0% compared with 7.2% at Skyworks Solutions.
Skyworks Solutions pays a dividend yielding 2.4%; Cirrus Logic does not pay one.
Cirrus Logic scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 11 for Skyworks Solutions), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRUS | SWKS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $13.2B |
| Share price | $109.82 | $87.58 |
| Change, 1 year | −16.4% | 11.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 39.3% | −46.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 1.31 |
| Employees | 1,668 | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 20 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.4× (better) | 45.4× |
| P/S | 2.7× (better) | 3.3× |
| P/B | 2.5× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.9× (better) | 40.5× |
| P/FCF | 9.6× (better) | 30.4× |
| PEG | 0.37 | – |
| FCF yield | 10.4% (better) | 3.3% |
| Fair value | $185.74 | $60.75 |
| Margin of safety | 40.9% (better) | −44.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.2% (better) | 0.06% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | 4.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 23.0% (better) | −26.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 28.0% (better) | −22.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 16.7% (better) | −8.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 52.8% (better) | 40.7% |
| Operating margin | 23.0% (better) | 7.6% |
| Net margin | 21.0% (better) | 7.2% |
| FCF margin | 27.9% (better) | 10.8% |
| Return on equity | 20.9% (better) | 5.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 28.9% (better) | 5.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −2.62 |
| Interest coverage | 471× (better) | 11.5× |
| Current ratio | 7.58 (better) | 3.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 11.03 (better) | 6.70 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.4% |
| Payout ratio | – | 147% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 9.1% |
| Buyback yield | 3.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.8% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 122% |
| Held by insiders | 0.64% | 0.49% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$13.5M | −$765K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.0% | 18.6% |
Go deeper
- CRUS stock overview
- CRUS income statement
- CRUS valuation and score
- SWKS stock overview
- SWKS income statement
- SWKS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.