Crescent Energy vs Devon Energy
CRGY and DVN side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CRGY and DVN compare
Devon Energy is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as Crescent Energy ($57.4B against $4.7B).
Crescent Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.3% versus 14.6% for Devon Energy).
Devon Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.7% compared with 1.3% at Crescent Energy.
Both pay dividends: Crescent Energy yields 3.4% and Devon Energy 2.1%.
Devon Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Crescent Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CRGY | DVN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.7B | $57.4B |
| Share price | $14.20 | $52.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 74.4% | 62.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 19.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.55 |
| Employees | 1,066 | 2,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.4× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.4× (better) | 7.9× |
| P/FCF | – | 12.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.2% |
| Fair value | $30.25 | $41.28 |
| Margin of safety | 53.1% (better) | −26.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.3% (better) | 14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 36.5% (better) | 28.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 137% (better) | 15.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −5.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 20.6% | – |
| Net margin | 1.3% | 16.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 23.9% |
| Return on equity | – | 11.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.31 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.24 | 1.36 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.94 (better) | 0.72 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.01 | 1.66 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.4% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 256% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.01% | 1.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% | 3.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.3% | 92.4% |
| Held by insiders | 34.8% | 0.78% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$402M | −$5.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.1% | 2.6% |
Go deeper
- CRGY stock overview
- CRGY income statement
- CRGY valuation and score
- DVN stock overview
- DVN income statement
- DVN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.