Devon Energy vs Expand Energy
DVN and EXE side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DVN and EXE compare
Devon Energy is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as Expand Energy ($57.4B against $21.0B).
On earnings, Expand Energy is cheaper: it trades at 7.8× trailing earnings, against 12.4× for Devon Energy.
Expand Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.3% versus 14.6% for Devon Energy).
Expand Energy keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.5% compared with 16.7% at Devon Energy.
Both pay dividends: Devon Energy yields 2.1% and Expand Energy 2.5%.
Expand Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 8 for Devon Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DVN | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $57.4B | $21.0B |
| Share price | $52.15 | $90.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 62.7% | −9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.7% | 37.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.58 |
| Employees | 2,200 | 1,600 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.4× | 7.8× (better) |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 1.4× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× | 3.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.2× | 7.8× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.2% | 12.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $41.28 | $111.34 |
| Margin of safety | −26.3% | 18.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.6% | 59.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.9% (better) | 18.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 1250% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.6% | 2869% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 26.9% |
| Net margin | 16.7% | 20.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 23.9% (better) | 19.7% |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 12.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | 0.19 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 0.46 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 16.8× |
| Current ratio | 0.72 | 0.96 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.66 | 2.65 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 2.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.5% |
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | 2.8% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.4% | 95.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.31% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.4M | $877K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- DVN stock overview
- DVN income statement
- DVN valuation and score
- EXE stock overview
- EXE income statement
- EXE valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.