Devon Energy vs EOG Resources
DVN and EOG side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How DVN and EOG compare
EOG Resources is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Devon Energy ($86.8B against $57.4B).
On earnings, Devon Energy is cheaper: it trades at 12.4× trailing earnings, against 12.9× for EOG Resources.
EOG Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.1% versus 14.6% for Devon Energy).
EOG Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.4% compared with 16.7% at Devon Energy.
Both pay dividends: Devon Energy yields 2.1% and EOG Resources 2.5%.
EOG Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 8 for Devon Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | DVN | EOG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $57.4B | $86.8B |
| Share price | $52.15 | $165.54 |
| Change, 1 year | 62.7% | 56.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 19.7% | 74.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 0.52 |
| Employees | 2,200 | 3,400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.4× (better) | 12.9× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 3.2× |
| P/B | 1.4× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 12.2× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.2% | – |
| Fair value | $41.28 | $163.57 |
| Margin of safety | −26.3% | −1.2% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.6% | 19.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 28.9% (better) | 15.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 20.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −5.6% | 24.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 32.9% |
| Net margin | 16.7% | 25.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 23.9% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.5% | 22.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 22.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.31 | 0.25 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.36 | 0.22 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 33.0× |
| Current ratio | 0.72 | 1.85 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.66 | 4.26 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% | 2.5% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 21.6% |
| Buyback yield | 1.3% | 3.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.5% | 5.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.4% | 96.5% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 0.23% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.4M (better) | −$10.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.6% | 3.1% |
Go deeper
- DVN stock overview
- DVN income statement
- DVN valuation and score
- EOG stock overview
- EOG income statement
- EOG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.