CenterPoint Energy vs Entergy
CNP and ETR side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNP and ETR compare
Entergy is the larger company, worth 1.8 times as much as CenterPoint Energy ($51.4B against $28.0B).
On earnings, CenterPoint Energy is cheaper: it trades at 25.0× trailing earnings, against 28.2× for Entergy.
Entergy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.5% versus 7.1% for CenterPoint Energy).
Both pay dividends: CenterPoint Energy yields 2.2% and Entergy 2.3%.
CenterPoint Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Entergy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNP | ETR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.0B | $51.4B |
| Share price | $42.44 | $110.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.0% | 15.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 59.1% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.43 |
| Employees | 3,712 | 12K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.0× (better) | 28.2× |
| P/S | 2.9× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 2.4× (better) | 2.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.9× (better) | 15.1× |
| PEG | 119.33 | 2.10 (better) |
| FCF yield | −9.6% | −5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.12 | $78.92 |
| Margin of safety | −17.5% (better) | −39.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 9.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 5.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.9% (better) | −3.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 100.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 23.2% (better) | 22.9% |
| Net margin | 11.6% | – |
| FCF margin | −28.0% | −22.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% (better) | 5.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.95 | 1.90 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.76 | 5.65 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× (better) | 2.1× |
| Current ratio | 1.12 (better) | 0.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.90 | 1.03 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 2.3% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 52.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | −2.6% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | −0.30% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 98.0% |
| Held by insiders | 0.30% | 0.23% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$200K (better) | −$12.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- CNP stock overview
- CNP income statement
- CNP valuation and score
- ETR stock overview
- ETR income statement
- ETR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.