CenterPoint Energy vs Eversource Energy
CNP and ES side by side, both in electric services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNP and ES compare
CenterPoint Energy and Eversource Energy are about the same size, with market caps of $28.0B and $25.8B.
On earnings, Eversource Energy is cheaper: it trades at 17.8× trailing earnings, against 25.0× for CenterPoint Energy.
Eversource Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.8% versus 7.1% for CenterPoint Energy).
Both pay dividends: CenterPoint Energy yields 2.2% and Eversource Energy 4.5%.
Eversource Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for CenterPoint Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNP | ES |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $28.0B | $25.8B |
| Share price | $42.44 | $68.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.0% | −7.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 59.1% | −18.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 3,712 | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.0× | 17.8× (better) |
| P/S | 2.9× | 1.8× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.9× | 10.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 86.7× |
| PEG | 119.33 | 4.40 (better) |
| FCF yield | −9.6% | 1.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $36.12 | $82.21 |
| Margin of safety | −17.5% | 16.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 7.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.8% | 8.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 19.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.9% | 65.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 100.0% | – |
| Operating margin | 23.2% (better) | 21.5% |
| Net margin | 11.6% | – |
| FCF margin | −28.0% | 2.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% (better) | 5.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.95 | 1.78 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.76 | 5.16 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× (better) | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | 1.12 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.90 (better) | 0.78 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | 4.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 52.7% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 3 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 86.1% |
| Held by insiders | 0.30% | 0.09% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$200K (better) | −$3.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 2.5% |
Go deeper
- CNP stock overview
- CNP income statement
- CNP valuation and score
- ES stock overview
- ES income statement
- ES valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.