CNH Industrial vs Terex
CNH and TEX side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNH and TEX compare
CNH Industrial is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Terex ($14.6B against $6.4B).
On earnings, Terex is cheaper: it trades at 28.4× trailing earnings, against 47.0× for CNH Industrial.
Terex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (40.1% versus 0.64% for CNH Industrial).
Terex keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.6% compared with 1.7% at CNH Industrial.
Both pay dividends: CNH Industrial yields 0.85% and Terex 1.2%.
Terex scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for CNH Industrial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNH | TEX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.6B | $6.4B |
| Share price | $11.76 | $56.15 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | 0.30% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.4% | 15.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 34K | 11K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 9 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.0× | 28.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | – | 1.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 11.9× |
| Fair value | $7.93 | $41.09 |
| Margin of safety | −48.4% | −36.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.64% | 40.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | 12.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −62.2% | 26.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −61.5% | −15.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.6% (better) | 17.1% |
| Operating margin | – | 5.7% |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 2.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 5.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.52 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.02 |
| Interest coverage | – | 2.2× |
| Current ratio | – | 1.76 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 | 2.06 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | 1.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 44.7% | 34.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.85% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.8% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 30.0% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $210K (better) | −$2.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- CNH stock overview
- CNH income statement
- CNH valuation and score
- TEX stock overview
- TEX income statement
- TEX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.