Caterpillar vs CNH Industrial
CAT and CNH side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CAT and CNH compare
Caterpillar is the larger company, worth 20 times as much as CNH Industrial ($286B against $14.6B).
On earnings, Caterpillar is cheaper: it trades at 26.8× trailing earnings, against 47.0× for CNH Industrial.
Caterpillar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (18.4% versus 0.64% for CNH Industrial).
Both pay dividends: Caterpillar yields 0.75% and CNH Industrial 0.85%.
Caterpillar scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 7 for CNH Industrial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CAT | CNH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $286B | $14.6B |
| Share price | $622.75 | $11.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 6.4% | 10.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 202% | −33.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.01 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 118K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.8× (better) | 47.0× |
| P/S | 3.8× | 0.8× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 26.8× | – |
| PEG | 1.89 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.7% | – |
| Fair value | $440.09 | $7.93 |
| Margin of safety | −41.5% (better) | −48.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 18.4% (better) | 0.64% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | 4.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −62.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.2% (better) | −61.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 28.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.3% (better) | 30.6% |
| Operating margin | 17.5% | – |
| Net margin | – | 1.7% |
| FCF margin | 14.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Current ratio | 1.37 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 4.34 (better) | 1.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.75% | 0.85% (better) |
| Payout ratio | – | 44.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 7.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.3% (better) | 0.85% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.0% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 0.22% | 30.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$244M | $210K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.7% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- CAT stock overview
- CAT income statement
- CAT valuation and score
- CNH stock overview
- CNH income statement
- CNH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.