AGCO vs CNH Industrial
AGCO and CNH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGCO and CNH compare
CNH Industrial is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as AGCO ($14.6B against $7.8B).
On earnings, AGCO is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 47.0× for CNH Industrial.
AGCO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.7% versus 0.64% for CNH Industrial).
AGCO keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.2% compared with 1.7% at CNH Industrial.
Both pay dividends: AGCO yields 1.1% and CNH Industrial 0.85%.
AGCO scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 7 for CNH Industrial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGCO | CNH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $14.6B |
| Share price | $110.91 | $11.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.4% | 10.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −11.2% | −33.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 22K | 34K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.4× (better) | 47.0× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.4× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | – |
| Fair value | $112.89 | $7.93 |
| Margin of safety | 1.8% (better) | −48.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% (better) | 0.64% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 4.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 436% (better) | −62.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 439% (better) | −61.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.3% | 30.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | – |
| Net margin | 5.2% (better) | 1.7% |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | – |
| Return on equity | 12.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 7.1% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.57 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.32 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 2.47 (better) | 1.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.85% |
| Payout ratio | 16.0% | 44.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% (better) | 0.85% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.0% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 18.3% | 30.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$110M | $210K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 5.9% |
Go deeper
- AGCO stock overview
- AGCO income statement
- AGCO valuation and score
- CNH stock overview
- CNH income statement
- CNH valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.