CNH Industrial vs Manitowoc
CNH and MTW side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How CNH and MTW compare
CNH Industrial is the larger company, worth 18 times as much as Manitowoc ($14.6B against $831M).
On earnings, Manitowoc is cheaper: it trades at 41.9× trailing earnings, against 47.0× for CNH Industrial.
Manitowoc grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.9% versus 0.64% for CNH Industrial).
CNH Industrial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.7% compared with 0.87% at Manitowoc.
CNH Industrial pays a dividend yielding 0.85%; Manitowoc does not pay one.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | CNH | MTW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.6B | $831M |
| Share price | $11.76 | $23.03 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.7% | 106% |
| Change, 5 years | −33.4% | 3.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.41 |
| Employees | 34K | 4,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.0× | 41.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× | 0.4× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 12.0× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.4% |
| Fair value | $7.93 | $20.45 |
| Margin of safety | −48.4% | −12.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.64% | 8.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.1% | 9.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −62.2% | −55.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −61.5% | −53.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.6% (better) | 18.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 3.1% |
| Net margin | 1.7% (better) | 0.87% |
| FCF margin | – | 3.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 2.9% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 4.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.81 |
| Current ratio | – | 2.11 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.04 | 2.30 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.85% | – |
| Payout ratio | 44.7% | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.85% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.8% | 83.9% |
| Held by insiders | 30.0% | 5.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $210K (better) | −$106K |
| Superinvestors holding | 3 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.9% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- CNH stock overview
- CNH income statement
- CNH valuation and score
- MTW stock overview
- MTW income statement
- MTW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.