BorgWarner vs Oshkosh
BWA and OSK side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BWA and OSK compare
BorgWarner is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Oshkosh ($10.9B against $8.6B).
BorgWarner grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.40% versus −0.68% for Oshkosh).
Both pay dividends: BorgWarner yields 1.3% and Oshkosh 1.6%.
BorgWarner scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 11 for Oshkosh), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BWA | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.9B | $8.6B |
| Share price | $53.30 | $139.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.4% | 12.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 13.6% | 21.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.91 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 700 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.7× | – |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.0× | 8.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 9.4× (better) | 10.3× |
| FCF yield | 10.6% (better) | 9.7% |
| Fair value | $45.65 | $113.82 |
| Margin of safety | −16.7% (better) | −22.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.40% (better) | −0.68% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 257% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 273% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −11.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.6% (better) | 16.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% | 8.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.4% | – |
| FCF margin | 8.1% (better) | 8.0% |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% | 12.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 | 0.26 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.03 | 0.83 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 8.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.41 | 1.63 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.09 | 3.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.6% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 29.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −3.8% | 13.6% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 6.7% (better) | 3.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 7.9% (better) | 5.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.86% | 0.79% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.1M | −$2.0M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.5% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- BWA stock overview
- BWA income statement
- BWA valuation and score
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.