Sierra Bancorp vs Plumas Bancorp
BSRR and PLBC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BSRR and PLBC compare
Sierra Bancorp is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Plumas Bancorp ($545M against $437M).
On earnings, Plumas Bancorp is cheaper: it trades at 10.5× trailing earnings, against 10.8× for Sierra Bancorp.
Plumas Bancorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (389% versus 2.8% for Sierra Bancorp).
Sierra Bancorp keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.8% compared with 36.7% at Plumas Bancorp.
Both pay dividends: Sierra Bancorp yields 2.5% and Plumas Bancorp 2.1%.
Sierra Bancorp scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 15 for Plumas Bancorp), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BSRR | PLBC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $545M | $437M |
| Share price | $42.02 | $62.74 |
| Change, 1 year | 43.7% | 50.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 57.1% | 76.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 55 | 246 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 15 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.8× | 10.5× (better) |
| P/S | 4.4× | 3.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.5× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/FCF | 10.7× | 10.5× (better) |
| PEG | 0.94 (better) | 20.24 |
| FCF yield | 9.3% | 9.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $37.57 | $52.27 |
| Margin of safety | −11.8% (better) | −20.0% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 2.8% | 389% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.5% | 111% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 27.2% | 59.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 35.2% | 39.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 6.0% | 10.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 40.8% (better) | 36.7% |
| FCF margin | 40.9% (better) | 36.2% |
| Return on equity | 14.0% | 16.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.25 | 0.32 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.5% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 27.1% | 21.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.6% (better) | −3.6% |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.6% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 60.0% | 49.7% |
| Held by insiders | 6.7% | 7.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.0M | −$115K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 5.3% |
Go deeper
- BSRR stock overview
- BSRR income statement
- BSRR valuation and score
- PLBC stock overview
- PLBC income statement
- PLBC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.