Bel Fuse vs Vicor
BELFA and VICR side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BELFA and VICR compare
Vicor grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (81.8% versus 25.3% for Bel Fuse).
Vicor scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 9 for Bel Fuse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BELFA | VICR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $8.8B |
| Share price | $188.90 | $191.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 38.9% | 110% |
| Change, 5 years | 1118% | 23.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.17 | 1.98 |
| Employees | 321 | 1,092 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 61.2× |
| P/S | – | 11.4× |
| P/B | – | 10.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 76.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 172× |
| PEG | – | 0.93 |
| FCF yield | – | 0.58% |
| Fair value | – | $108.51 |
| Margin of safety | – | −76.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.3% | 81.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 8.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 122% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 115% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 44.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.5% (better) | 34.8% |
| Operating margin | 15.9% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net margin | – | 18.8% |
| FCF margin | 9.9% (better) | 6.6% |
| Return on equity | – | 20.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.5% | 27.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.11 | – |
| Interest coverage | 10.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.48 | 13.25 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 91.53 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 47.6% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 46.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$18.1M (better) | −$399M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 9.7% |
Go deeper
- BELFA stock overview
- BELFA income statement
- BELFA valuation and score
- VICR stock overview
- VICR income statement
- VICR valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.