Bel Fuse vs MACOM Technology Solutions
BELFA and MTSI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BELFA and MTSI compare
MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (37.3% versus 25.3% for Bel Fuse).
MACOM Technology Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 9 for Bel Fuse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BELFA | MTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $18.8B |
| Share price | $184.22 | $245.76 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.9% | 44.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 1109% | 217% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 321 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 57.0× |
| P/S | – | 14.1× |
| P/B | – | 11.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 49.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 64.1× |
| PEG | – | 1.14 |
| FCF yield | – | 1.6% |
| Fair value | – | $167.28 |
| Margin of safety | – | −46.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.3% | 37.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% | 16.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 51.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.5% | 58.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 15.9% | 23.0% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 25.3% |
| FCF margin | 9.9% | 22.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 22.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.5% | 23.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.20 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.11 | −1.23 |
| Interest coverage | 10.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.48 (better) | 2.53 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 19.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 6.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M (better) | −$283M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- BELFA stock overview
- BELFA income statement
- BELFA valuation and score
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.