Allegro MicroSystems vs MACOM Technology Solutions
ALGM and MTSI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ALGM and MTSI compare
MACOM Technology Solutions is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Allegro MicroSystems ($17.9B against $5.7B).
On earnings, MACOM Technology Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 74.9× trailing earnings, against 509× for Allegro MicroSystems.
MACOM Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (28.4% versus 24.2% for Allegro MicroSystems).
MACOM Technology Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 1.5% at Allegro MicroSystems.
MACOM Technology Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 6 for Allegro MicroSystems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ALGM | MTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.7B | $17.9B |
| Share price | $30.53 | $234.39 |
| Change, 1 year | −0.68% | 53.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.2% | 219% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.70 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 4,250 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 509× | 74.9× (better) |
| P/S | 6.0× (better) | 15.4× |
| P/B | 5.9× (better) | 11.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 50.6× (better) | 66.9× |
| P/FCF | 64.8× (better) | 87.7× |
| FCF yield | 1.5% (better) | 1.1% |
| Fair value | $14.98 | $123.70 |
| Margin of safety | −104% | −89.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.2% | 28.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% | 12.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 47.2% | 56.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | 4.9% | 18.1% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.5% | 20.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 9.3% | 17.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.5% | 17.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% | 15.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.30 | 0.22 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.09 (better) | −1.23 |
| Interest coverage | 2.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.70 (better) | 2.34 |
| Altman Z-score | 8.70 | 18.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 79.5% | 95.9% |
| Held by insiders | 1.1% | 6.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$5.2M (better) | −$320M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- ALGM stock overview
- ALGM income statement
- ALGM valuation and score
- MTSI stock overview
- MTSI income statement
- MTSI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.