AptarGroup vs Latham
ATR and SWIM side by side, both in miscellaneous plastics products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATR and SWIM compare
AptarGroup is the larger company, worth 9.3 times as much as Latham ($9.1B against $972M).
On earnings, AptarGroup is cheaper: it trades at 34.7× trailing earnings, against 103× for Latham.
Latham grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.9% versus 9.0% for AptarGroup).
AptarGroup keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.7% compared with 1.6% at Latham.
AptarGroup pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Latham does not pay one.
AptarGroup scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Latham), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATR | SWIM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $9.1B | $972M |
| Share price | $143.09 | $8.26 |
| Change, 1 year | 21.1% | 21.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 9.9% | −63.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 1.89 |
| Employees | 14K | 1,804 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 34.7× (better) | 103× |
| P/S | 2.3× | 1.6× (better) |
| P/B | 3.5× | 2.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.1× (better) | 13.8× |
| P/FCF | 30.8× | 20.9× (better) |
| PEG | 1.94 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.2% | 4.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $128.82 | $5.49 |
| Margin of safety | −11.1% (better) | −50.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% | 11.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −36.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.9% (better) | −10.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% (better) | 33.8% |
| Operating margin | 11.9% (better) | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 6.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| FCF margin | 7.4% | 7.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.9% (better) | 2.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% (better) | 5.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 0.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.49 (better) | 2.33 |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× (better) | 1.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.50 | 2.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.18 (better) | 2.17 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | – |
| Payout ratio | 46.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | – |
| Buyback yield | 3.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 17.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.1M | $316K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 4.4% |
Go deeper
- ATR stock overview
- ATR income statement
- ATR valuation and score
- SWIM stock overview
- SWIM income statement
- SWIM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.