AptarGroup vs Carlisle Companies
ATR and CSL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATR and CSL compare
Carlisle Companies is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as AptarGroup ($14.9B against $8.7B).
On earnings, Carlisle Companies is cheaper: it trades at 21.6× trailing earnings, against 33.3× for AptarGroup.
AptarGroup grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.0% versus 1.9% for Carlisle Companies).
Carlisle Companies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.2% compared with 6.7% at AptarGroup.
Both pay dividends: AptarGroup yields 1.0% and Carlisle Companies 1.2%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATR | CSL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.7B | $14.9B |
| Share price | $137.20 | $376.31 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.4% | 13.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 4.3% | 61.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.71 | 0.92 |
| Employees | 14K | 5,900 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 | 15 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 33.3× | 21.6× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 3.3× (better) | 9.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.7× (better) | 14.1× |
| P/FCF | 29.6× | 17.2× (better) |
| PEG | 1.86 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.4% | 5.8% (better) |
| Fair value | $128.41 | $355.93 |
| Margin of safety | −6.8% | −5.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | 4.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −36.3% | −10.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −34.0% | −2.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.9% | 24.2% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 35.8% (better) | 35.3% |
| Operating margin | 11.9% | 19.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 6.7% | 14.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.4% | 17.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | 38.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.4% | 20.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.53 (better) | 1.79 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.49 (better) | 1.83 |
| Interest coverage | 7.2× | 9.7× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.50 | 2.60 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.10 | 5.28 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | 1.2% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 46.2% | 25.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 6 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 4.9% | 15.4% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 4.1% | 7.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 5.1% | 8.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.3% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 0.78% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.8M (better) | −$28.2M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.3% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- ATR stock overview
- ATR income statement
- ATR valuation and score
- CSL stock overview
- CSL income statement
- CSL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.