Atmos Energy vs Venture Global
ATO and VG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How ATO and VG compare
Venture Global is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Atmos Energy ($37.0B against $29.1B).
On earnings, Venture Global is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 20.5× for Atmos Energy.
Venture Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (101% versus 6.5% for Atmos Energy).
Both pay dividends: Atmos Energy yields 2.3% and Venture Global 0.63%.
Atmos Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Venture Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | ATO | VG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $29.1B | $37.0B |
| Share price | $172.41 | $14.79 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.44% | 68.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 83.4% | 41.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.37 | 0.36 |
| Employees | 5,487 | 2,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 20.5× | 11.6× (better) |
| P/S | 5.9× | 2.2× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 4.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | 10.8× (better) |
| PEG | 2.04 | – |
| FCF yield | −6.9% (better) | −18.9% |
| Fair value | $161.26 | $23.50 |
| Margin of safety | −6.9% | 37.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.5% | 101% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 21.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 15.5% | 170% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 8.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 53.5% |
| Operating margin | 37.0% | 37.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 28.5% | – |
| FCF margin | −41.1% (better) | −41.2% |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 6.2% | 13.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 (better) | 4.88 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.75 (better) | 5.27 |
| Interest coverage | 12.8× (better) | 3.5× |
| Current ratio | 0.81 | 1.19 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.65 (better) | 1.23 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% (better) | 0.63% |
| Payout ratio | 45.1% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 16 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | −3.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −1.4% | 0.63% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.5% | 18.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.40% | 81.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$26.7K (better) | −$410M |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.7% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- ATO stock overview
- ATO income statement
- ATO valuation and score
- VG stock overview
- VG income statement
- VG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.