Aptiv vs Oshkosh
APTV and OSK side by side, both in motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How APTV and OSK compare
Aptiv and Oshkosh are about the same size, with market caps of $8.1B and $8.6B.
Aptiv grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.3% versus 4.2% for Oshkosh).
Oshkosh pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Aptiv does not pay one.
Oshkosh scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Aptiv), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | APTV | OSK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $8.1B | $8.6B |
| Share price | $38.81 | $141.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −52.4% | 13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.0% | 26.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 140K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 36.6× | – |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.8× |
| P/B | 0.9× (better) | 1.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.5× (better) | 9.4× |
| P/FCF | 11.8× | 8.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 8.5% | 11.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $52.43 | $111.52 |
| Margin of safety | 26.0% (better) | −27.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.3% (better) | 4.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.3% (better) | 4.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −78.3% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −75.7% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −35.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 19.6% (better) | 15.4% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | 6.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.2% | – |
| FCF margin | 3.7% | 9.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 3.3% | 10.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.61 | 0.24 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 2.38 | 0.56 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.02 (better) | 1.72 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.38 | 3.16 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 11 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 13.6% |
| Buyback yield | 8.9% (better) | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 8.9% (better) | 5.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 101% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $6.0M (better) | −$1.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.4% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- APTV stock overview
- APTV income statement
- APTV valuation and score
- OSK stock overview
- OSK income statement
- OSK valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.