Amentum vs Huntington Ingalls Industries
AMTM and HII side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMTM and HII compare
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Amentum ($12.5B against $5.3B).
On earnings, Huntington Ingalls Industries is cheaper: it trades at 17.0× trailing earnings, against 26.3× for Amentum.
Huntington Ingalls Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.6% versus 11.4% for Amentum).
Huntington Ingalls Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.4% compared with 1.4% at Amentum.
Huntington Ingalls Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Amentum does not pay one.
Huntington Ingalls Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for Amentum), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMTM | HII |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.3B | $12.5B |
| Share price | $21.87 | $316.88 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.8% | 6.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 63.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.21 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 50K | 44K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 26.3× | 17.0× (better) |
| P/S | 0.4× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 1.1× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.8× | 13.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 11.3× (better) | 38.2× |
| PEG | – | 7.94 |
| FCF yield | 8.9% (better) | 2.6% |
| Fair value | $25.55 | $304.42 |
| Margin of safety | 14.4% (better) | −4.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.4% | 12.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 5.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 292% (better) | 28.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 113% (better) | 28.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −2.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% | – |
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 5.8% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.4% | 5.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.4% (better) | 2.4% |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 5.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.81 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.65 | 2.11 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 7.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.52 (better) | 1.26 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.02 | 2.94 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 13 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 5.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 89.6% | 88.9% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 0.95% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$18.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 3.8% |
Go deeper
- AMTM stock overview
- AMTM income statement
- AMTM valuation and score
- HII stock overview
- HII income statement
- HII valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.