Ameriprise Financial vs Price T Rowe
AMP and TROW side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMP and TROW compare
Ameriprise Financial is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Price T Rowe ($43.4B against $22.2B).
On earnings, Price T Rowe is cheaper: it trades at 10.5× trailing earnings, against 11.0× for Ameriprise Financial.
Ameriprise Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus 6.9% for Price T Rowe).
Price T Rowe keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 28.4% compared with 20.7% at Ameriprise Financial.
Both pay dividends: Ameriprise Financial yields 1.3% and Price T Rowe 5.0%.
Price T Rowe scores higher on the StockData Score (23 against 18 for Ameriprise Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMP | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $43.4B | $22.2B |
| Share price | $490.83 | $103.90 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.6% | 0.38% |
| Change, 5 years | 60.8% | −53.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 23K | 7,773 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 | 23 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.0× | 10.5× (better) |
| P/S | 2.2× (better) | 2.9× |
| P/B | 8.5× | 1.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0× (better) | 7.5× |
| P/FCF | 5.9× (better) | 13.9× |
| PEG | 1.17 | 0.93 (better) |
| FCF yield | 16.9% (better) | 7.2% |
| Fair value | $715.82 | $149.15 |
| Margin of safety | 31.4% (better) | 30.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% (better) | 6.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | 5.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 22.0% (better) | 7.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.4% (better) | −1.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 32.0% |
| Net margin | 20.7% | 28.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 36.4% (better) | 20.7% |
| Return on equity | 72.0% (better) | 19.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 25.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 | 4.74 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 5.0% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.4% | 52.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 9 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.1% |
| Buyback yield | 8.0% (better) | 2.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.3% (better) | 7.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.8% | 89.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.26% | 0.80% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$65.9M | −$1.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | 12.7% |
Go deeper
- AMP stock overview
- AMP income statement
- AMP valuation and score
- TROW stock overview
- TROW income statement
- TROW valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.