Ameriprise Financial vs Apollo Global Management
AMP and APO side by side, both in services allied with the exchange of securities. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AMP and APO compare
Apollo Global Management is the larger company, worth 1.6 times as much as Ameriprise Financial ($68.4B against $43.4B).
On earnings, Ameriprise Financial is cheaper: it trades at 11.0× trailing earnings, against 42.0× for Apollo Global Management.
Apollo Global Management grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.2% versus 8.8% for Ameriprise Financial).
Ameriprise Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with 5.2% at Apollo Global Management.
Both pay dividends: Ameriprise Financial yields 1.3% and Apollo Global Management 1.9%.
Ameriprise Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 11 for Apollo Global Management), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AMP | APO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $43.4B | $68.4B |
| Share price | $490.83 | $115.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.6% | −7.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 60.8% | 50.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.19 | 1.48 |
| Employees | 23K | 4,130 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.0× (better) | 42.0× |
| P/S | 2.2× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 8.5× | 3.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.0× (better) | 6.2× |
| P/FCF | 5.9× | – |
| PEG | 1.17 | – |
| FCF yield | 16.9% | – |
| Fair value | $715.82 | $121.32 |
| Margin of safety | 31.4% (better) | 4.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.8% | 41.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.6% | 68.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 14.8% (better) | −44.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 22.0% (better) | −47.1% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 24.4% | 66.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 20.7% (better) | 5.2% |
| FCF margin | 36.4% | – |
| Return on equity | 72.0% (better) | 9.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 (better) | 0.18 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 1.9% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 14.4% | 67.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −2.9% |
| Buyback yield | 8.0% (better) | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 9.3% (better) | 3.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 88.8% | 65.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.26% | 23.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$65.9M | −$9.8M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.0% | – |
Go deeper
- AMP stock overview
- AMP income statement
- AMP valuation and score
- APO stock overview
- APO income statement
- APO valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.