AGCO vs Lindsay
AGCO and LNN side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGCO and LNN compare
AGCO is the larger company, worth 7.1 times as much as Lindsay ($7.7B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Lindsay is cheaper: it trades at 20.1× trailing earnings, against 28.9× for AGCO.
AGCO grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.86% versus −6.0% for Lindsay).
Lindsay keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.8% compared with 2.8% at AGCO.
Both pay dividends: AGCO yields 1.1% and Lindsay 1.4%.
Lindsay scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 7 for AGCO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGCO | LNN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.7B | $1.1B |
| Share price | $111.94 | $107.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 3.2% | −4.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −5.7% | −32.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.92 | 0.66 |
| Employees | 22K | 1,083 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.9× | 20.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.7× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 2.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.6× | 11.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.2× (better) | 31.4× |
| FCF yield | 3.8% (better) | 3.2% |
| Fair value | $83.07 | $125.62 |
| Margin of safety | −34.7% | 14.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.86% (better) | −6.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 2.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −25.6% | −24.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −22.9% | −21.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% (better) | 6.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.0% | 28.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.6% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 8.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | 5.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.5% | 10.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.4% | 11.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.66 | 0.23 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.98 (better) | −0.83 |
| Current ratio | 1.32 | 3.15 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.47 | 4.99 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 30.2% | 27.7% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Buyback yield | – | 7.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 8.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 103% |
| Held by insiders | 18.6% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$113M | −$49.4K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | 9.2% |
Go deeper
- AGCO stock overview
- AGCO income statement
- AGCO valuation and score
- LNN stock overview
- LNN income statement
- LNN valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.