AGCO vs Toro
AGCO and TTC side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGCO and TTC compare
Toro is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as AGCO ($10.2B against $7.8B).
On earnings, AGCO is cheaper: it trades at 15.4× trailing earnings, against 28.9× for Toro.
Toro grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus 1.7% for AGCO).
Toro keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.6% compared with 5.2% at AGCO.
Both pay dividends: AGCO yields 1.1% and Toro 1.4%.
Toro scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 13 for AGCO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGCO | TTC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.8B | $10.2B |
| Share price | $110.91 | $107.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.4% | 43.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −11.2% | 9.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 22K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 15.4× (better) | 28.9× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 2.2× |
| P/B | 1.9× (better) | 7.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.4× (better) | 17.3× |
| P/FCF | 23.5× | 14.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | 7.0% (better) |
| Fair value | $112.89 | $93.72 |
| Margin of safety | 1.8% (better) | −15.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% | 5.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 5.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 436% (better) | 9.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 439% (better) | 13.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% (better) | 0.91% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.3% | 33.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 10.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.2% | 7.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 3.2% | 15.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.9% | 26.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 7.1% | 17.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 (better) | 0.72 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.57 | 1.24 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.32 | 1.58 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.47 | 5.33 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 1.4% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 16.0% | 41.3% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 16 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.0% (better) | 8.7% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.1% | 4.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.0% | 94.3% |
| Held by insiders | 18.3% | 0.39% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$110M | −$14.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.2% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- AGCO stock overview
- AGCO income statement
- AGCO valuation and score
- TTC stock overview
- TTC income statement
- TTC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.