AGCO vs Alamo
AGCO and ALG side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How AGCO and ALG compare
AGCO is the larger company, worth 4.6 times as much as Alamo ($7.9B against $1.7B).
On earnings, Alamo is cheaper: it trades at 22.1× trailing earnings, against 29.6× for AGCO.
Alamo grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.8% versus 0.86% for AGCO).
Alamo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.7% compared with 2.8% at AGCO.
Both pay dividends: AGCO yields 1.0% and Alamo 0.96%.
Alamo scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for AGCO), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | AGCO | ALG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $7.9B | $1.7B |
| Share price | $114.79 | $141.71 |
| Change, 1 year | 9.1% | −14.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −3.3% | −6.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 22K | 3,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.6× | 22.1× (better) |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.9× | 15.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 26.9× | 12.6× (better) |
| PEG | – | 113.50 |
| FCF yield | 3.7% | 7.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $83.51 | $151.77 |
| Margin of safety | −37.5% | 6.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.86% | 1.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.0% | 6.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −25.6% (better) | −33.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −22.9% (better) | −33.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 11.5% | 12.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.0% (better) | 22.9% |
| Operating margin | 5.6% | 6.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.8% | 4.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.9% | 8.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.5% | 6.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.4% | 7.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.66 | 0.20 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.98 | 0.01 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.32 | 4.19 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.48 | 4.64 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.96% |
| Payout ratio | 30.2% | 20.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 11 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.0% | 18.2% (better) |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.56% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% | 1.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.4% | 97.9% |
| Held by insiders | 18.6% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$113M | −$964K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.7% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- AGCO stock overview
- AGCO income statement
- AGCO valuation and score
- ALG stock overview
- ALG income statement
- ALG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.