Rayonier vs Texas Pacific Land
RYN and TPL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RYN and TPL compare
Texas Pacific Land is the larger company, worth 3.1 times as much as Rayonier ($20.1B against $6.4B).
On earnings, Texas Pacific Land is cheaper: it trades at 34.3× trailing earnings, against 47.8× for Rayonier.
Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.3% versus 0.44% for Rayonier).
Texas Pacific Land keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 60.7% compared with 7.8% at Rayonier.
Both pay dividends: Rayonier yields 4.9% and Texas Pacific Land 0.80%.
Texas Pacific Land scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Rayonier), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RYN | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.4B | $20.1B |
| Share price | $21.50 | $291.91 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.9% | −13.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −46.2% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.69 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 285 | 114 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 47.8× | 34.3× (better) |
| P/S | 6.6× (better) | 20.8× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 11.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | 136× | 24.5× (better) |
| PEG | 0.79 (better) | 12.35 |
| Fair value | $14.81 | $236.41 |
| Margin of safety | −45.1% | −23.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.44% | 25.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −10.8% | 21.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −90.0% | 23.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −90.9% | 23.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 62.2% (better) | 22.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 75.5% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.8% | 60.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.0% | 37.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.3% | 51.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 25.02 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | 201× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.56 | 5.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.94 | 68.29 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.80% |
| Payout ratio | 393% | 27.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 18.2% (better) | 13.9% |
| Buyback yield | 0.05% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 0.80% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.2% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.0% | 30.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.8M | −$2.3M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.9% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- RYN stock overview
- RYN income statement
- RYN valuation and score
- TPL stock overview
- TPL income statement
- TPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.