Rayonier vs Texas Pacific Land
RYN and TPL side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How RYN and TPL compare
Texas Pacific Land is the larger company, worth 4.0 times as much as Rayonier ($22.9B against $5.8B).
On earnings, Texas Pacific Land is cheaper: it trades at 42.3× trailing earnings, against 43.1× for Rayonier.
Texas Pacific Land grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.8% versus 0.44% for Rayonier).
Texas Pacific Land keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 60.3% compared with 7.8% at Rayonier.
Both pay dividends: Rayonier yields 5.4% and Texas Pacific Land 0.70%.
Texas Pacific Land scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 9 for Rayonier), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | RYN | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.8B | $22.9B |
| Share price | $19.38 | $331.68 |
| Change, 1 year | −14.2% | 7.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.2% | 118% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 0.63 |
| Employees | 285 | 114 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 43.1× | 42.3× (better) |
| P/S | 6.0× (better) | 25.5× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 13.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 125× | 30.6× (better) |
| PEG | 0.71 (better) | 15.22 |
| Fair value | $14.59 | $219.17 |
| Margin of safety | −32.9% (better) | −51.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.44% | 20.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −10.8% | 21.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −90.0% | 17.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −90.9% | 17.4% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 62.2% (better) | 22.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.7% | – |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 74.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 7.8% | 60.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 2.0% | 36.6% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.3% | 49.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 25.02 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.56 | 4.55 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.78 | 76.62 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.4% (better) | 0.70% |
| Payout ratio | 393% | 29.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 18.2% (better) | 13.9% |
| Buyback yield | 0.06% (better) | 0.04% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.5% (better) | 0.74% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 94.2% | 72.8% |
| Held by insiders | 1.0% | 30.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$4.1M | −$2.3M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 8.8% |
Go deeper
- RYN stock overview
- RYN income statement
- RYN valuation and score
- TPL stock overview
- TPL income statement
- TPL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.